Wednesday, June 12, 2019
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and the doctor assuming the role of God Essay
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and the doctor assuming the post of divinity fudge - Essay ExampleA new species would bless me as their cause and source many happy and excellent natures would owe their be to me. No become could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs. (Shelley, 58) Therefore, it is evident that there is an insatiable urge in achiever Frankenstein to sweep up the role of God and he is often criticized for crossing honest and moral boundaries with the aim of achieving this goal. An understanding of his experiences with the monster in the novel confirms that his choice is executed with ill-intentions and questionable for ethical precedents. This paper makes a reflective exploration of the idea that superior was wrong in assuming the role of God. Assuming the role of God for the purpose of creating keep is wrong, and such an endeavor led to the detriment of Dr. Frankenstein in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein. A profound analysis of th e theme of assuming the role of God in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein confirms that the major character, Dr. Frankenstein, has been highly obsessed the lure of creating tone from his early childhood onwards. At his young age, Victor was fascinated by the wonders life offered him and he wanted to learn about all of them and he dedicated his time to exploring the realms of these wonders through the study of alchemy, chemistry, philosophy and human anatomy. As a youngster, Victor was obsessed with the power of noesis and wished to find out the secrets of nature and its powers. The most learned philosopher knew little more. He had partially unveiled the face of Nature, but her deific lineaments were still a wonder and a mystery I had gazed upon the fortifications and impediments that seemed to keep human beings from entering the citadel of nature, and rashly and ignorantly I had repined. (47) Significantly, his obsession for knowledge led Victor to make a life-altering decision the deci sion to create an animate being. After several years of labor intensive work fasten together different pieces of flesh into one being Victor finally completed his task and created life. The outcome, however, was not the wonderful being he had hoped for, but sooner a monstrous atrocity. He had created a fearsome and inhuman creature he created a monster. Thus, Harold Bloom presents Victor Frankenstein, in his act of creation, as being momentarily a moral idiot, like so many who have done his work after him When the dull yellow eye of his creature opens, this creator falls from the autonomy of a supreme artificer to the terror of a child of earth (Bloom, 6) Therefore, it is fundamental to maintain that Victors attempt to assume the role of God by creating a monster resulted in his ultimate detriment and tragedy in life. One of the essential factors about the character of Victor in the novel is that he is presented as a counterfeit of God and as a Faustian figure, rather than a Pro methean one. Significantly, the intention of the protagonist in assuming the role of God in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein has not been one of serving the welfare of humanity, but rather to serve his egoistic motive of acquiring power and respect of his creation. In fact, the most fundamental irony of the novel Frankenstein Or,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.